20
November , 2018
Tuesday

Email This Post Email This Post

The United States Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of a Chicago rapist in a case that had potential negative implications for prosecutors across the country and was personally argued by the Cook County State’s Attorney, according to the Office of State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez.

The court’s 5-4 decision is a victory for prosecutors and law enforcement across the nation because an unfavorable ruling could have adversely impacted a prosecutor’s ability to use expert testimony in criminal cases about scientific evidence such as DNA. 

Last December, State’s Attorney Alvarez traveled to Washington D.C. to personally argue the case that witness testimony in the sexual assault trial had met all of the legal requirements and did not violate the defendant’s constitutional rights. Forty other state and local prosecutors, as well as the United States Government, filed legal briefs supporting Alvarez’s arguments. 

“It was an honor and a privilege to be able to argue such an important case before the Supreme Court and we are extremely pleased with this ruling,” Alvarez said.  “The court’s decision is a legal victory, not just for prosecutors, but also for crime victims across the nation, who are seeking justice.”

In Williams v. Illinois, Sandy Williams was convicted of raping a young woman on Chicago’s South Side in 2006. Williams challenged his conviction claiming that his constitutional rights were violated when an expert witness testified about DNA evidence linking him to the crime.

In his appeals, Williams’ attorneys argued that the testimony violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser because her conclusions were based on the results of tests that she had not personally conducted even though she was an expert in forensic DNA analysis.

After both the Illinois Appeals Court and the Illinois Supreme Court ruled against Williams, he appealed to the High Court which agreed to decide the case. An unfavorable ruling could have severely undermined the ability of prosecutors nationwide to use expert testimony on scientific evidence such as DNA in criminal cases. 

The Supreme Court decided in favor of State’s Attorney Alvarez’s position and upheld Williams’ conviction as well as the use of expert testimony.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

Welcome to CopyLine Magazine! The first issue of CopyLine Magazine was published in November, 1990, by Editor & Publisher Juanita Bratcher. CopyLine’s main focus is on the political arena – to inform our readers and analyze many of the pressing issues of the day - controversial or otherwise. Our objectives are clear – to keep you abreast of political happenings and maneuvering in the political arena, by reporting and providing provocative commentaries on various issues. For more about CopyLine Magazine, CopyLine Blog, and CopyLine Television/Video, please visit juanitabratcher.com, copylinemagazine.com, and oneononetelevision.com. Bratcher has been a News/Reporter, Author, Publisher, and Journalist for 33 years. She is the author of six books, including “Harold: The Making of a Big City Mayor” (Harold Washington), Chicago’s first African-American mayor; and “Beyond the Boardroom: Empowering a New Generation of Leaders,” about John Herman Stroger, Jr., the first African-American elected President of the Cook County Board. Bratcher is also a Poet/Songwriter, with 17 records – produced by HillTop Records of Hollywood, California. Juanita Bratcher Publisher

Recent Posts